07 Jul

Can we make our own ESD tools?

Q: Can we make our own ESD Tools?

A: Perhaps.  Since common hand tools can be at risk of creating an ESD event via CDM, what do we do about it?  I was able to treat the screw driver in my last installation with our ESD anti-stat chemical Shock Stop.  We also have Ultra Spray which lasts for a good deal longer than gimmicky products on the market, which are probably based on a fabric softener.

Our industrial products mentioned above will last longer, but need to be re-applied depending on usage.

I was brainstorming and came up with a more permanent solution to the ESD Screw Driver.  Pretty effective, huh?

1-measuring-resistance-of-non-esd-screw-driver3

1-measuring-resistance-of-non-esd-screw-driver3

2-esd-chemical-shock-stop

2-esd-chemical-shock-stop

3-treating-non-esd-screw-driver-with-anti-stat-shock-stop

3-treating-non-esd-screw-driver-with-anti-stat-shock-stop

4-remeasuring-screw-driver-resistance

4-remeasuring-screw-driver-resistance

5-looking-for-a-more-permanent-esd-screw-driver

5-looking-for-a-more-permanent-esd-screw-driver

6-ground-zero-esd-modified-screw-driver

6-ground-zero-esd-modified-screw-driver

6.5 esd-modified

6.5 esd-modified

7-measuring-resistance-of-gz-esd-modified-sd

7-measuring-resistance-of-gz-esd-modified-sd

Until I can work out a deal with Western Forge in Colorado Springs (dreaming a bit here), ESD Finger Cots!  Ground Zero ElectroStatics, Inc. has got them.  We’ve also got GZ-Shock Stop and GZ Ultra Spray for industrial uses in the EPA.

www.gndzero.com

1-719-676-2548

Order a sample today.

07 Jul

Demonstrating CDM Discharge using Common Hand Tools

Q:

What is the significance of the time to the charge generation in tribocharging?

Why is it that in tribocharging, there is a big charge produce in short period of time while small charge will be generated at long time? ( at the same force)

(I took the liberty here to respond to the question and go a bit further and look at CDM Testing as described in a recent issue of Conformity.)

A: First a little background about charge as it relates to ESD (ElectroStatic Discharge).

Triboelectric charge is merely the contact and separation of materials.  “It involves the transfer of electrons between materials.”  Which materials lose electrons and which gain them depends on the materials.

Static electricity can be measured in coulombs, and related to voltage potential via the equation: q=CV.  q = charge in coulombs, C = Capacitance, V = Voltage

The industry typically uses electrostatic potential and thus uses voltage to look at this energy form.  Voltage is merely charge potential with respect to a ground point or reference and measured in volts (v).

Insulators or materials with high resistance restricts or prevents flow of electrons across (surface) or through (volume) it’s material.

Conductors or materials with low resistance easily allows the flow of electrons across it (surface) or through (volume)  it’s material.

Insulators and isolated conductors can tribocharge to high voltages and will remain for a long time… so long as energy is not transferred via induction (isolated conductors) by bringing other objects into it’s vicinity and grounding the other object, by grounding the isolated conductor, or by balanced ionization (isolated conductors or insulators).

When isolated conductors are grounded, they (becoming grounded conductors) will enable electrons to flow easily to ground and the charge upon it will become neutralized and reduced to near zero.

Insulators cannot be grounded.  They can induce charge to isolated conductors and can cause electrical overstress/ESD events to isolated conductors at the time they are grounded via the charge field and do not need to contact the isolated conductors in order to do so.

Here’s another way to say that; “CDM (Charged Device Model) charging can produce two separate discharge events.  Here’s how it works.  If you ground a conductor (the conductive blade of a screwdriver for example) while it is in the presence of any item carrying an electrostatic field ( a charged piece of plastic or clothing), the conductor will acquire an electrostatic charge that may be sufficient to cause damage when discharged.”

Human Body Model, as is described in ANSI/ESD S20.20-2007… and the ESD control thereof, is concerned with limiting the voltage in the EPA for the protection of ESDS devices (ESD sensitive devices) to 100 volts and a discharge to within that level in less than 0.3 seconds for ESD Technical Elements (some quicker) at minimum.

I need to know what specifically are you interested in; the HBM, MM (Machine Model), or CDM (Charged Device Model)?  Keep in mind, that “volt per volt, MM discharge is an order magnitude more powerful than HBM discharge because the resistance of human body has been removed from the equation.”

In the article in Conformity, “Demonstrating CDM Discharge Using Common Hand Tools” provided by the ESDA, they state; “The damage threat from hand tools is CDM charging of the hand tool, accompanied by MM discharge to the component or device.”

Source: Conformity : ESD Open Forum April 2009 pg 20.

The following pics depict the testing I did in my lab in accordance with what I’d learned from a recent Conformity article from the ESD Open Forum entitled Demonstrating CDM Discharge using Common Hand Tools.  It involves charge, not by contact, but by induction;

1-non-esd-screwdriver2

1-non-esd-screwdriver2

2-shockstop-treated-screw-driver2

2-shockstop-treated-screw-driver2

3-gz-shock-stop-sample1

3-gz-shock-stop-sample1

4-charging-dp-with-silk1

4-charging-dp-with-silk1

5-zeroing-field-meter1

5-zeroing-field-meter1

6-donning-wrist-strap1

6-donning-wrist-strap1

7-confirm-blade-is-at-zero-on-non-esd-sd4

7-confirm-blade-is-at-zero-on-non-esd-sd4

8-touching-blade-for-cdm-charge2

8-touching-blade-for-cdm-charge2

9-cdm-charge-potential-measurement1

9-cdm-charge-potential-measurement1

10-zeroing-shock-stop-treated-sd-blade4

10-zeroing-shock-stop-treated-sd-blade4

11-confirm-zero-volts-on-shock-stop-treated-sd1

11-confirm-zero-volts-on-shock-stop-treated-sd1

12-recharging-dp-with-silk1

12-recharging-dp-with-silk1

13-touching-blade-on-esd-treated-sd-for-cdm-charge1

13-touching-blade-on-esd-treated-sd-for-cdm-charge1

14-cdm-measurement-for-esd-treated-sd1

14-cdm-measurement-for-esd-treated-sd1

15-rechecking-cdm-on-non-esd-sd1

15-rechecking-cdm-on-non-esd-sd1

16-remeasuring-cdm-on-non-esd-sd1

16-remeasuring-cdm-on-non-esd-sd1

07 Jul

Are ESD shoes and Conductive shoes the same thing?

 

Q:

Are ESD shoes and Conductive shoes the same thing?

A: There are two types of ESD shoes, Static Dissipative and Static Conductive.

The Static Conductive shoe will guarantee a combined resistance of personnel and footwear of less than 1.0E6 Ohms.  I have a pair of Static Conductive shoes that when I’m standing on a static conductive flooring system (2.5E4 Ω to 1.0E6 Ω), my combined resistance from my body through the ESD footwear and through the ESD conductive flooring system to electrical ground or earth is less than 1.0E6 ohms per DoD 4145.26-M, C6.4.7.5.1: “The maximum resistance of a body, plus the resistance of conductive shoes, plus the resistance of the floor to the ground system shall not exceed 1,000,000 ohms total”… “The contractor can set the maximum resistance limits for the floor to the ground system and for the combined resistance of a person’s body plus the shoes, as long as the total resistance does not exceed 1,000,000 ohms.”

This Static Conductive shoe is typically used for electrical safety requirements for facilities that deal with explosive environments such as ordinance, munitions, explosive powders, flammable liquids, etc.  This is outside of the realm of ANSI/ESD S20.20-2007 and MIL-HDBK-263B.

If you’re goal is the protection of static sensitive devices, then Static dissipative shoes on a static conductive flooring system or a static dissipative flooring system will suffice so long as the combined resistance of personnel, footwear, and flooring to electrical or earth ground is less than 3.5E7 Ω as per ANSI/ESD STM97.1-2006.  In that case, a good static dissipative shoe will be more than 1.0E6 or a meg ohm, but the resistance will probably be less than 35 Meg ohms.  The best way to measure the footwear is to have personnel wear them for at least 10 minutes prior to going to the tester and checking for pass/fail low/fail high, as that’s the most practical way to test them.  You can measure the resistance of the shoe from insole to outsole, but they aren’t used that way on the ESD flooring system.  The ESD shoe relies on sweat from the personnel that wears them.

My combined resistance from my body, through my Static Conductive C4327 (men’s) or C437 (woman’s) shoes and through a static conductive floor to electrical/earth ground is about 7.0E5 Ω.  My combined resistance from my body through my Static Dissipative C4341 shoes and through a static conductive floor to electrical/earth ground is about 1.6E6 Ω.

I hope this answers your questions.  Please comment.

Thank you very much, Pat

Static Conductive shoe C4327 Resistance per ANSI/ESD STM97.1-2006

Static Conductive shoe C4327 Resistance per ANSI/ESD STM97.1-2006

0708090842

0708090845

Static Dissipative shoe C4341

Static Dissipative shoe C4341